Instead of eating 10 a week, some people may not only consume 8 a week. Its not up to you or any bureaucrat to try to tax me in to buying "healthier" foods. professional custom essay house However, if a tax on fast food saves lives, we should not avoid implementing it just because it is the poor who will mostly benefit. Presumably fatty foods are not as addictive. Obese people die early and save the government paying pensions In a perverse way, this is actually a good argument.
Although it is not always the case, I have noticed that some foods that are advertised as the healthiest choices often cost far more than the regular choices. The authors also claim this is a conservative estimate, because it ignores the benefits from the reduced incidence of diabetes, strokes and other obesity related illnesses. best biology research paper topics Its introduction into almost every mass-produced, low-cost food item in our grocery stores is one of the primary reasons for the rise in childhood and adult obesity.
Persuasive essay helper junk food tax best freelance content writing websites online
The argument against a extra tax on fast food is that those on low incomes are more likely to consume unhealthy foods, therefore this tax will increase inequality. Government can't legislate these kinds of decisions. Whilst I agree that people need to take responsibility for the health choices they make, the constant bombardment of adverts along with high prices of healthy alternatives doesn't help. If you want to hit obese folks in the pocketbook and punish them for their decisions, give incentives for good health.
Is it really a good idea to introduce a fat tax, or do Big Macs deserve to remain cheap and free of extra tax? The point is that at the moment society is effectively subsidising the consumption of unhealthy foods, and ultimately it is the taxpayer who has to pay for this. No matter how expensive and higher the taxes people tend to use or pay for it because they like it and willing to pay for it.
Essay editing software guitar
Externalities of Unhealthy Foods. They will no longer be more expensive than the cheap, unhealthy, fast food. buy a research paper online lanterns Presumably fatty foods are not as addictive.
Some to writing my paper down
Obese people die early and save the government paying pensions In a perverse way, this is actually a good argument. Finding an appropriate person or firm can seem difficult, but there are many options for people confused by their taxes. Smoking was advertised being 'good for your throat' in a vintage advert I saw once, and adverts for alcohol never depict the rabble of staggering, shrieking, fighting, binge drinkers you'll find outside any pub on a Saturday night. It is just that now they have to pay a fairer reflection of the true cost to society.
Is it really a good idea to introduce a fat tax, or do Big Macs deserve to remain cheap and free of extra tax? Who is the government to tell people what to eat? Extra Tax on Fast Food. While many can see through misleading advertising, there are always more to be swept along by it. Therefore, this reduces the external cost of obesity and so lessens the justification for a tax based on externalities.
Another problem is that unhealthy food tends to replace other, more nutritious foods. Many lives could easily be saved. Although it is not always the case, I have noticed that some foods that are advertised as the healthiest choices often cost far more than the regular choices. The US wasn't founded to be a nanny state, but just one to give people the bare essentials to succeed in life.